World War 3 on steam with Russia

 RUSSIA VS. US: WORLD 3:

Should the United States and Russia become involved in nuclear war, the US will be wiped out of the face of the earth, Europe solitaire editor Jean-Paul Baquiast wrote.
Russia and China are better prepared for a possible nuclear war with the US, which would mean that the United States would not be completely destroyed, a French journalist said.
His comments come as Russian President Vladimir Putin threatens to use his nuclear power against the United States and its allies if NATO deploys more troops in Baltic provinces or if efforts are made to bring Crimea back to Ukraine.

 

WW3 Russia

The US will be completely destroyed:

And so according to Jean-Paul Baquiast, when the US realizes that it will not be able to fight Russian violence in the normal and non-military way, it will try to end it with its armed forces. And in the event of an armed conflict, the US will no doubt make a series of coercive attacks on Russia.
"The chances of the United States destroying Russia without any consequences are slim," said a Europe solitaire editor.
And you have a point. What do you think Russia will do? Sit back, wait and watch? Pretend the attack didn't happen? You see, while Washington will be able to strike a large part of Russia's territory, the US will be wiped off the face of the earth. And Russia has a huge advantage if that kind of conflict occurs as it will be able to launch its advanced missiles from its ships off the US coast.
As for the Russian arrows, it’s all another story. As previously reported, Putin has signed a proclamation banning the shipment of S-300 missiles, the world's most advanced air defense strategy, in Iran.
But Russia is likely to use these arrows in a nuclear war with the US as the Kremlin is currently producing the best type of these arrows. While it is worth mentioning that even these misses will not be able to withstand the massive onslaught of heavy missiles from US ships.

  Nuclear war between Russia and US Almost:

It is unlikely that such a conflict could occur. The cost of such surgery is too high for Russia or the US to intervene. The Russians, most likely, have invaded Ukraine or the Baltic States. This is not to be expected because Russia receives much better funding from these provinces as energy customers than the domestic provinces that need funding. And it is unlikely that the Russian and American cyber-war would have erupted in the heat of the war. However, for the sake of the question, let us consider the emergence of an argument. It occurs beyond the Baltic States and includes the Russian invasion for the purpose of settlement and forgery — and, not the most likely scenario, but active for the purpose of answering the question.

Background and causes:

World War 3 was a civil war that lasted from 2019 to 2023, with opposition parties led by the U.S. Many factors contributed to the start of the war, including the complete economic collapse of Europe, and the dissolution of NATO following Russia's clashes with the Baltic States and Central Europe. Following the failure of the United States' international diversity, unrest in the Middle East escalated into a full-blown civil war, which eventually led to the unification of many eastern

The United States' outrage grew at an alarming rate because of their failure to defeat Islamic militants and halted Russia's further invasion of Europe, leading to the disintegration of the American people which caused economic hardship since the so-called Great Depression II, or Second Great Depression (2020-2032). With NATO weak and crippled and the United Nations deteriorating as a result of the formation of world conflicts, no major warring factions could withstand the powerful influence of Axis.

World War updates

 

The war officially began on February 7, 2019, when Putin invaded Ukraine, however, it was not a world war until the invasion of Baghdad in September 2019. The war escalated soon after it began, escalating into a nine-year world war. . The war ended with the reorganization of the country's borders and the shameful defeat of the United States and its allies. The nation was not dismantled and remained an independent nation, but faced difficult conditions and limitations after its disappearance, forcing it to pay taxes. Russia occupied most of Europe and central Asia, while China occupied Korea and all of eastern Asia and Indonesia. The death toll from this war was 165 million, making it the worst and most deadly war in human history. Nuclear weapons were twice used to kill 4.4 million people. All other casualties were military or military personnel during the war.

 Finding Frames:

The first business order of this question is to clarify what it means to win.
In a very small sense, man wins the battle by preventing the opponent from achieving goals against his one enemy; e.g., if Russia attacks the Baltic States, NATO wins if it can prevent Russia from staying in those countries.
To a large extent, man wins by eliminating man's oppressive power to fight the war completely. In the Nuclear War, NATO wins if it can undermine Russia's military capabilities while controlling its military capabilities. Both sides are working for a small win and want to avoid escalation.
In the war dominated by the Baltics, the US will be joined by NATO. However, some things are equal, and some are not. NATO can generally measure Russia's integration rate, for example. Russia is likely to be unable to maintain high winds for long. The winner is the side that can combine its strengths effectively, and avoid making costly mistakes. 

Background:

'Who won the war between the US and Russia?' One must try to compare the strengths and weaknesses of each opponent.
To begin with, the US has a budget of more than $ 90 Trillion. That investment generates an estimated GDP of about $ 20 Trillion, with the U.S. defense spending about $ 610 billion.
The value of the Russian business is about $ 2 Trillion. It generates an annual GDP of $ 2 Trillion, of which Russia's defense spends about $ 66 billion.
The US is a major global power with 800 military bases, in 70 countries around the world. Apart from its borders, Russia has nine bases, seven of which are in border regions.
The US Navy has a blue navy of about 430 warships, on two seas, including 14SS, 11 aircraft and 21 submarines and the Marine Corps of three battleships.
Russia has an air force of about 70 navy, including 11 SSSs. They are to be divided into four divisions, the northern armies, the Baltic, the Black Sea, and the Pacific.

 World war 3 preparation:

 The Russian Air Force has about 3200 aircraft including 50 strategic bombs and 1000 helicopters. The US Air Force operates 5400 fighter jets, with 5,000 helicopters, and another 1000 Naval aircraft, with a total capacity of 11,400.
The US has thousands of uniformed 1,000,000 people, forming an army of 45 co-workers and guards of 45 90 Combat Brigade Teams. The Russian army has about 1,000,000 uniformed staff, 90 brigades, and 2.3 million deputies.
Russian special forces cost about 10,000. They acquired new equipment and computer equipment; and receive advanced military martial arts training.
About 70,000 US Special Forces. In addition to self-defense, US Special Forces receive special, specific purpose, weapons, equipment and training.
American pilots have more flight time than Russian pilots. Native American workers continue three times a year, and their Russian counterparts do so every two to three years.
The U.S. military and navy are employing state-of-the-art technology, with satellite and air surveillance to maintain full military awareness. The Russian military is training cooperatively.
Russia's military equipment is so large that it could not support the general invasion of its borders. The U.S. military's equipment is designed to keep jobs long.
Russia can encroach on its borders, at the same time with great power and there is a possibility of initial success. But it has a very limited ability to fight in a war beyond its borders.

The US is able to mobilize and attack with 150k troops on the high seas. These forces can be seriously involved in well-established armies in almost any nation in the world.

 

Result of nuclear War

Occupation: 

In a war when Russia invaded the Baltic states, the Russians had nine wars on the border. Nine brakes will be heavily reinforced with weapons (AFVs), Infant Vehicles (IFV) and artillery.

There will be three to six brigades in the region as final destinations. In addition, a total of 300 helicopters, 1000 fighter jets with less than a dozen planes and two corveettes.
Their goal will be to reach the heads of Estonia and Latvia (possibly even Lithuania) and to besiege within 60 hours (2.5 days), using regular troops.
The US consolidation will be a reaction and it will take a long time to consolidate and move at sufficient defensive rates.
The Baltic States will include up to six child crashes in self-defense. They would have no tanks, and small, outdated artillery.
The US and NATO will deploy three wars, as well as special units of war within 48 hours. With so many tanks, artillery and land mines, NATO / Baltic allied forces will be hard pressed to put pressure on the Russians. NATO Special Forces may contact Baltic Army athletes to form strike groups. They were initially attacking local back areas, targeting Russian officials to assassinate, and cut off communications.
Over time (after 48 hours), the US and NATO can respond effectively. Using bases all over Europe, having high numbers, technology, and pilot training, would gain tremendous power in the Baltics.
Thereafter, using air pollution, they divided Russian forces using their assets and communications, disrupted consolidation and replacement, and fought a major war of attrition. The construction of Brigades from the US and NATO settled in Poland, while the Polish forces systematically reduced the Russian forces at Kaliningrad Oblast.
The US Navy could have prevented it from dividing the Baltic Sea. Using external attacks, it could have pushed the Russian Baltic Fleet back. This may take a week.
Meanwhile, Russian troops are still pushing the pockets of rival towns in the Baltics. The Russians will threaten to escalate war using European invasions including Poland, Germany, and Denmark, or the Scandinavian provinces such as Norway, Sweden or Finland.
It is unthinkable that Russia would launch nuclear weapons directly against US forces for fear of retaliation. Russia's medical network would be taxed for speeding and injured people.

 Climb:

As mentioned earlier, each side will try to avoid escalation. However, the increase cannot be ignored.
Russia is likely to do well with its threats to extend war by attacking US warships and air bases, and following US satellite missiles. However, because of Russia's poor economy, US collisions will cost the Russians dearly. The missing Russian satellite could be one of many. The missing US satellite could be one of the hundreds.
There will be an increase in cyber warfare wars, with each side trying to break into individual computer networks. This will include power outages, communication networks, medical data transfers, market exchanges, municipal water supply and mobility.
If there was no escalation in the nuclear exchange, a war of attrition would strike the Russians far more than the US and NATO. That’s because the US and NATO have more of you there than the Russians and they can replace the losses faster than the Russians. Russia's brutal tactics and mass bombings (as seen in Chechnya and Ukraine) reduced its US / NATO counterparts directly to the war bombing. The cost to the Russian Federation is simply too high and they will be forced to withdraw. 

Nuclear Option:

The start of the Nuclear War will begin with the exchange of Tit-for-Tat against the air and military bases inside and near the battlefield. As each side grew weak, it would spread over a wide area, eventually striking the battlefield. The US and Russia each can hit another with nearly 1,500 nuclear warheads. In addition, each side has nearly 5500 warheads in the stores. The French and the UK each have their own independent power.
Each side has its own land development plans, windmills, and marine equipment systems. These include silos, the introduction of underground vehicles, strategic bomb blasts, landmine explosions, land and warheads introduced under war.
According to the Start Agreement, Russian warheads could be launched against 1500 targets, eroding 3% of US territory, hitting 450 missiles, killing 150 million and 320 million people (almost the lowest).
U.S. warheads could be launched compared to 1,500 projects, destroying 1.5% of Russia's surface (Russia's largest), striking 316 sites, killing an estimated 70 million people and 140 million people (and, probably the lowest) ). Given the size of the target stones and the GDP / hectare, the estimated value of each of the Russian destinations presented reaches $ 180 B / warhead. The target price of a US arrow is equal to $ $ B B / warhead. What this means is that most US infrastructure will live longer than Russia.
US physical infrastructure is 50 times better than Russia. In addition to this, the US online system is much stronger than Russia. The US recovery is likely to take place sooner than in Russia. 

When NATO Attacks:

The test listed above is based on the assumption that Russia introduces rivals entering Ukraine or the Baltics. If the US / NATO tries to insult Russia the situation changes dramatically. Russia would protect them. It will feel a higher moral high ground. There was nothing that they could do to protect their country.  

US contains new Russia of nuclear power:

Donald Trump, apparently, intends to break another important agreement between Russia and the United States - the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. Why in the 1980s did American Tomahawk arrows remove fear from the USSR leadership, and what dangers in our country and around the world do American programs exist today? 

Donald Trump and Ronald Reagan:

Horrible sign of Nuclear war

We look down on the imagination, but in vain. It is in Trump's mental disposition and his will and dislike that you can often find answers to questions: what Americans do and what Americans will do. By the time Trump went to the presidency, he had two slogans. Man faced everything and is well remembered today: "Make America Great Again." The second was only concerned with foreign policy and it sounded like this: And it was impossible to miss this moment.
Peace with power ”is one of the American symbols of the post-World War II era. It returns to the statement of the Roman emperor Hadrian: "Peace in power, if it does not succeed, peace be at war." The slogan was used by Republicans in the United States more than once, until 1980 when it was raised by former US President Ronald Reagan.
As you know, this is how America does it. In 2016, Donald Trump adopted the slogan "Peace in power". And it is under this resolution that he has developed his foreign policy. Trump, whose “golden age” fell during Reagan’s time, and his interest in foreign policy was directly raised in the Reagan era, apparently sees himself as a follower of his tactics.

Frequently, Trump unwittingly copied Reagan, for example, with the great power of investing loyal governments in Latin America - and this despite the fact that the United States would have gained greater control over Venezuela, if they had done something softer. Nuclear warheads are not such a “cosplay” - they copy without understanding.

Adding to these concerns is the appointment of General Robin Rand as head of the US Air Force Global Strike Command.
Knowing the nature of this General, he is likely to follow in the footsteps of General Curtis LeMay, who carefully prepared for the massive invasion of the Soviet Union.
And let us not forget that Russia is now more of a threat than the USSR, and that it is more dangerous than the union, which collapsed in 1991. According to NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, "modern Russia is more dangerous than the Soviet Union. The USSR was more predictable than the current leadership." 

 Pre-war years:

2015 was a year of great turmoil around the world, as it saw the beginning of the economic downturn, later known simply as "The Collapse " in the wake. The accident has led to reduced financial benefits for all Americans, both business owners and employees. The Obama administration continued to raise taxes on the American people and eventually many became too poor to contribute to the government. The government then cut off much trade with South America and Asia, bringing economic collapse to countries including Peru, Brazil, Argentina and Chile. A series of uprisings against these nations have become the Brazilian Civil War.

Sign of WW3

All South American countries have been unhappy with their governments, but no one can stop change without Brazil. The United States closed trade with China, which was a major historical event, and brought economic damage to both sides, but Obama believed that if the United States was not completely independent of other nations, it would emerge from the crisis. Japan / United States relations have become more bitter than friendship because of the difficulties involved.

China arrived in India at this time in the hope that they could resolve their differences and become friends, which was not yet successful. The border problem in the United States remained unresolved until about one fifth of the population came from Spain. About 10-20% of these were illegal immigrants from Central America, which meant that more people were in welfare and fewer taxpayers. The European economy collapsed in July 2015, causing almost half of the European Union to leave the EU. The value of the Euro was zero after the incident, and Europe began to feel the effects of Coll-fall. Many European nations have either squandered their medals or cut back on defense in the hope of improving their economy.
The Russian economy at this time was one of the few that said that, although it was not so large, it did not see the effects of the collapse on the rise because of sanctions imposed by the United States. In fact, the economy began to grow. Putin's European Union began to deteriorate, however, when the fall hit eastern Europe, including Belarus. Belarus plunged into a state of chaos, with most Russian opponents, and a few anti-Russian extremists embroiled in a series of violent conflicts, even though it was not difficult enough to be described as a civil war. Toward the end of 2015, a group of Russian warlords demanding Belarus become part of Russia, saw an anti-Russian political leader in Minsk and an enraged mob protesting near the Prime Minister. Fearing that the situation could escalate into an attack on the Prime Minister, the Russian offensive group fired on Russia's leader, killing and beating Prime Minister Andrei Kobyakov, but not killing him. This led people to believe that Russian leaders were plotting to overthrow the government and opposed the Separatist Movement in Belarus and raising awareness that although Belarus was considered Russia's economic aid, it was still experiencing the effects of Collfall's collapse. This has led to political change in Belarus turning many of the nation against Russia.

2016:

The United State's policy of segregation causes the deepest collapse in the country and its military budget is cut and the number of its employees reaches one million. Its sailors are almost there, but their air conditioning remains inactive. This time of year, Chris Christie is changing his party alliance because of the "need for a great government" and was chosen to go with Hillary Clinton as his opponent. The two parties are appealing to both sides and have won a landslide victory similar to Reagan's re-election, although they do not control Texas and most of the country's Great Plains.
The Brazilian World War culminated in the overthrow of the current government, but rebel leader Josè Rabelo, considered a freedom fighter and dictatorial regime, assumes power and established communist dictatorship on August 1, 2016. This strategy shows Fidel Castro of Cuba. Throughout the year, it is helping communist reforms throughout South America to overthrow social governments in Chile, Argentina, Peru and Ecuador, failing in Uruguay and Venezuela. These countries began to approach and form alliances based on the humiliation of the USA.
India-China relations are beginning to improve as they begin to trade with each other. China's Border crisis begins with a shortage of food and money in Southeast Asia as residents of these tribes begin to enter China illegally from the south. Russia's economy continues to grow as countries around the world start trading with Russia in the absence of the United States. The European Union has also tested the civil war in Kazakhstan led by anti-Russian forces that eventually succeeded in overthrowing the government. Kazakhstan's new president, Bakhtiyar Kussainov, while still a member of the European Union, is at war with Russia.
Europe continues to deteriorate, with almost all western European countries declaring extinction outside the UK, which after a short war due to unfavorable living conditions, broke into three countries, with Wales pulling northern Ireland, and Germany. Germany and Denmark formed an economic and military alliance for a while, Denmark became a German base where it would defend the German Defense Force, which began to grow after Germany left the EU, becoming almost a major military power in Europe. The treaty stimulated the economy, which in Europe was the largest.

 2019 (Jan-Feb): 

The US economy is booming and instability is rife in the nation. The renewal of the role that took place between Russia and the United States - Russia grew and its troops improved, and the United States dwindled as did the military. Many consider this to be the Second World War, but these people have made a serious mistake. Canadian troops surpass America.
BCS troops surpassed the United States, Canada and England, behind only Russia, China and Germany. Its economy exceeds that of China. The BCS has been reluctant to attack any U.S. alliance. Or the U.S.
The stories of Asia have always been the same, with the exception of the Japanese invasion of Taiwan which failed to protect the extra land of cities lost in tsunamis. Putin is finalizing plans for a major war in Europe and Asia, and depending on how it happens, in the United States and Canada. China's economy plunged into a second slowdown due to the suffering of immigrants, and decided to deal with the situation forcibly.
German troops pass through Canada, the U.S., and the BCS after a major crackdown on January 1. The British economy halts its decline, but its troops continue to plummet, and the Australian army defeats it on January 1. Sudan and South Sudan had a short war, which led to the unification of the two nations.

Russia

 

Conclusion: 

Participation in the Baltic is highly unlikely. It can be very expensive, forming a large list of injured people on both sides, especially among the citizens of the Baltic State.
Muscos knows about the cost vs benefits of the war and knows that the majority of people in the Baltic States are Russian. They could not hold them as the Soviet Union tried; it is almost impossible to catch them now effectively. Russia is also aware that US / NATO is being used more strategically than it would be to break Russia's borders by attacking troops.
However, in the event of such a conflict with the Baltic States, US / NATO's rise in equipment quality, quantity, staff training, and foreign political support, a major victory could, in the long run, go to the US / NATO.
Other conflict venues could be the Arctic, Central Asia, Syria, Iran or a resurgence of violence in the Balkans. In each of these areas, the Russian-American conflict would have looked very different.
None of these conflicting situations can arise when rational intelligence occurs. The fear that irrational minds, as well as pathologic interests, may try to divert public attention away from domestic problems (Trump's woes or Putin's economic woes), pushing them into foreign problems. That knowledge and Washington’s intention to launch a nuclear attack on the Russian territory has led to a wide-ranging Internet debate on whether it is possible or not.